Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rustc: Don't allocate a cnum to syntax crates #13565

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 18, 2014

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

Syntax-only crates are no longer registered with the cstore, so there's no need
to allocate crate numbers to them. This ends up leaving gaps in the crate
numbering scheme which is not expected in the rest of the compiler.

Closes #13560

Syntax-only crates are no longer registered with the cstore, so there's no need
to allocate crate numbers to them. This ends up leaving gaps in the crate
numbering scheme which is not expected in the rest of the compiler.

Closes rust-lang#13560
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2014
Syntax-only crates are no longer registered with the cstore, so there's no need
to allocate crate numbers to them. This ends up leaving gaps in the crate
numbering scheme which is not expected in the rest of the compiler.

Closes #13560
@bors bors closed this Apr 18, 2014
@bors bors merged commit 4ba94e2 into rust-lang:master Apr 18, 2014
@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the issue-13560 branch April 18, 2014 22:13
matthiaskrgr pushed a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Non-consecutive crate IDs triggering assert
3 participants