-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Complete type checker #52
Labels
A-type-system
Area: Type system
Comments
We rely on completeness in the typechecker now to drive a fair bit of other stuff. This is obsolete. |
oli-obk
pushed a commit
to oli-obk/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jul 19, 2017
keeperofdakeys
pushed a commit
to keeperofdakeys/rust
that referenced
this issue
Dec 12, 2017
There are 8 bits in a byte
rchaser53
pushed a commit
to rchaser53/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jan 19, 2019
Clean up and reorganize traits chapter
Aaron1011
pushed a commit
to Aaron1011/rust
that referenced
this issue
Oct 26, 2020
bors bot
referenced
this issue
in softdevteam/alloy
Apr 29, 2021
52: Build Boehm with more portable multithreading flag r=ltratt a=jacob-hughes The previous flag I'd used is not technically correct, because it unnecessarily restricts the build to Linux's threading model. Co-authored-by: Jake Hughes <[email protected]>
bors
pushed a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this issue
Oct 1, 2021
Deploy documentation to GitHub Pages
djtech-dev
pushed a commit
to djtech-dev/rust
that referenced
this issue
Dec 9, 2021
jaisnan
pushed a commit
to jaisnan/rust-dev
that referenced
this issue
Aug 27, 2024
celinval
pushed a commit
to celinval/rust-dev
that referenced
this issue
Nov 20, 2024
…`NonNull::read_unaligned` (rust-lang#156) Towards rust-lang#52 Contracts & Harnesses for `NonNull::read`, `NonNull::read_volatile`, `NonNull::read_unaligned` ### Discussion For the ensures clause in the contract for `NonNull::read`, I could not directly compare the value pointed by self and result due to unsized and lack of PartialEq implementation, and the comparison is currently moved to the harness. ### Verification Successful verification: ``` SUMMARY: ** 0 of 141 failed VERIFICATION:- SUCCESSFUL Verification Time: 0.1760525s Complete - 5 successfully verified harnesses, 0 failures, 5 total. ``` By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 and MIT licenses. --------- Co-authored-by: Zyad Hassan <[email protected]>
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
There are still a bunch of missing node cases in the type checker. Finish them off.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: