Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix an implied bound related to assoc types according to #12 #176

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 9, 2018

Conversation

scalexm
Copy link
Member

@scalexm scalexm commented Oct 4, 2018

See this comment. I explained why this is bad in the test I just added.

cc @nikomatsakis

@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

Ok, this is making my head hurt =)

I had no doubt it's correct, though, but it's not obvious to me yet.

@nikomatsakis nikomatsakis merged commit 08572fa into rust-lang:master Oct 9, 2018
scalexm added a commit to scalexm/chalk that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2018
@scalexm scalexm deleted the gat-fix branch November 29, 2018 18:34
nikomatsakis added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2018
Fix the rule introduced by #176 and accord doc with rustc-guide
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants