Add design document for DNN-based UPF selection #293
Conversation
|
Thanks for opening this PR, here are a couple comments:
|
|
@gab-arrobo we can add the 1 liner bullet in Roadmap. I wanted to have some design folder with proposals. |
design/upf-selection-design.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| ### 3.1. SMF Changes | ||
| - **SMF UPF Selection Logic:** | ||
| - Identify the code where SMF performs UPF selection. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Could you please provide mode details and rephrase the lines to reflect that what we intend to do. Line (1) seems to something study line 2, 3 is something about proposed code change. You need to work on this PR more to refine it further
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please let me know if this provides the clarity you were looking for or if there are any additional details you need.
anaswarac-dac
force-pushed
the
dnn-based-upf-selection
branch
from
0407d54 to
7435af0
Compare
design/upf-selection-design.md
Outdated
| mcc: "001" | ||
| mnc: "01" | ||
| site-name: "enterprise" | ||
| upf: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is where it limits one UPF per Slice.. We need changes in this config so that it remains backward compatible.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The upf field has been replaced by upfs to accommodate multiple UPF definitions. Each UPF is specified as an item in a list, with its own upf-name and upf-port
anaswarac-dac
force-pushed
the
dnn-based-upf-selection
branch
from
ae92a9e to
2a5040a
Compare
gab-arrobo
force-pushed
the
dnn-based-upf-selection
branch
from
2a5040a to
5b5d6ce
Compare
anaswarac-dac
force-pushed
the
dnn-based-upf-selection
branch
from
5b5d6ce to
0d137f4
Compare
Signed-off-by: anaswara <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: anaswara <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: anaswara <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: anaswara <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: anaswara <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: anaswara <[email protected]>
Updated Co-authored-by: Ajay Lotan Thakur <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: anaswara <[email protected]>
Updated Co-authored-by: Ajay Lotan Thakur <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: anaswara <[email protected]>
Updated Co-authored-by: Ajay Lotan Thakur <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: anaswara <[email protected]>
Updated Co-authored-by: Ajay Lotan Thakur <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: anaswara <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: anaswara <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: anaswara <[email protected]>
This pull request implements DNN-based UPF selection, allowing the SMF to select UPFs based on both DNN and Slice ID.
Reason for changes
This change is necessary to support scenarios where multiple DNNs are used within the same Slice ID, ensuring the correct UPF is selected based on the DNN.