-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enhanced validation checks for refresh tokens to ensure they meet specified constraints. #135
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new class, Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/Jwt/AbstractJwt.php (2)
34-34
: Good security practice but needs better documentationThe changes implement a good security practice by ensuring:
- Refresh tokens can't be used as access tokens
- Access tokens can't be used as refresh tokens
However, the naming and lack of documentation make this security measure less obvious. Consider:
- Adding PHPDoc comments explaining the validation logic
- Renaming constraints to better reflect their purposes (as mentioned in the previous comment)
Add documentation to explain the security measure:
+ /** + * Parse and validate a refresh token + * + * @param string $refreshToken The token to parse + * @throws ConstraintViolation If the token is an access token or invalid + * @return UnencryptedToken + */ public function parserRefreshToken(string $refreshToken): UnencryptedTokenAlso applies to: 76-77
Line range hint
1-150
: Minor improvements for code quality
Method names use "parser" instead of "parse" which is non-standard English:
parserRefreshToken
→parseRefreshToken
parserAccessToken
→parseAccessToken
Consider adding a configuration type for better type safety:
/** * @param array{ * alg: Signer, * key: Key, * ttl: int, * refresh_ttl: int, * blacklist: array{ * enable: bool, * connection: string, * ttl: int * } * } $config */
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/Jwt/AbstractJwt.php
(2 hunks)src/Jwt/AccessTokenConstraint.php
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/Jwt/AbstractJwt.php (1)
34-34
: Verify dependency injection and method usage
Please ensure:
- The dependency injection container is configured to provide
AccessTokenConstraint
- All calls to the parser methods are updated if method names are changed
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the DI configuration and method implementations.
Let me check one more thing to verify the DI configuration for the new dependencies.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
The changes are properly implemented and safe
The verification shows:
- The
AccessTokenConstraint
is properly used inAbstractJwt
along with its companionRefreshTokenConstraint
- The parser methods (
parserAccessToken
andparserRefreshToken
) are correctly implemented and their usage inAbstractTokenMiddleware
remains compatible - The constraints are properly defined in their own files (
src/Jwt/AccessTokenConstraint.php
andsrc/Jwt/RefreshTokenConstraint.php
) - The framework appears to use autowiring for DI, which means explicit configuration isn't required for these constraint classes
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for parser method usage
echo "Searching for parser method usage..."
rg -l "parserRefreshToken|parserAccessToken"
# Search for DI configuration
echo "Searching for DI configuration..."
fd -e php -e xml -e yaml config
Length of output: 497
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check DI configuration in JwtAuth module
echo "Checking JwtAuth ConfigProvider..."
cat src/JwtAuth/ConfigProvider.php
# Check the actual implementation of parser methods
echo -e "\nChecking AbstractJwt implementation..."
cat src/Jwt/AbstractJwt.php
# Check interface definition
echo -e "\nChecking JwtInterface..."
cat src/Jwt/JwtInterface.php
# Check middleware usage
echo -e "\nChecking AbstractTokenMiddleware..."
cat src/JwtAuth/Middleware/AbstractTokenMiddleware.php
Length of output: 9304
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for dependency injection configuration in other potential locations
echo "Searching for dependency configuration..."
rg -l "AccessTokenConstraint|RefreshTokenConstraint" --type php
# Check if there's a services.php or dependencies.php
fd -e php | grep -i "service\|dependenc"
Length of output: 444
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
AccessTokenConstraint
class to enhance token validation.Bug Fixes