Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhanced validation checks for refresh tokens to ensure they meet specified constraints. #135

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 4, 2024

Conversation

gladtoeatu
Copy link
Contributor

@gladtoeatu gladtoeatu commented Dec 4, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new AccessTokenConstraint class to enhance token validation.
    • Updated token parsing logic to incorporate access token constraints for improved security.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced validation checks for refresh tokens to ensure they meet specified constraints.

@dosubot dosubot bot added the size:M This PR changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 4, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 4, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new class, AccessTokenConstraint, in the src/Jwt directory, which implements a constraint for access tokens in the JWT handling process. Additionally, the AbstractJwt class is modified to include a new private readonly property, accessTokenConstraint, in its constructor. The parserRefreshToken method is updated to utilize this new property when parsing refresh tokens, while the parserAccessToken method remains unchanged in its parameters.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/Jwt/AbstractJwt.php Added private readonly property accessTokenConstraint to constructor. Updated parserRefreshToken to include accessTokenConstraint in the parse function call.
src/Jwt/AccessTokenConstraint.php Introduced new class AccessTokenConstraint implementing Constraint interface with method assert(Token $token) that checks if the token is related to 'refresh'.

Poem

In the land of tokens, so bright and fair,
A new constraint hops in with flair.
Access tokens now have a friend,
Parsing refreshes, on it we depend.
With each new change, we grow and play,
Hopping through code, come what may! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@dosubot dosubot bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 4, 2024
@zds-s
Copy link
Member

zds-s commented Dec 4, 2024

@coderabbitai review

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 4, 2024

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@zds-s zds-s changed the title refactor: 让token使用更规范 Enhanced validation checks for refresh tokens to ensure they meet specified constraints. Dec 4, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/Jwt/AbstractJwt.php (2)

34-34: Good security practice but needs better documentation

The changes implement a good security practice by ensuring:

  • Refresh tokens can't be used as access tokens
  • Access tokens can't be used as refresh tokens

However, the naming and lack of documentation make this security measure less obvious. Consider:

  1. Adding PHPDoc comments explaining the validation logic
  2. Renaming constraints to better reflect their purposes (as mentioned in the previous comment)

Add documentation to explain the security measure:

+    /**
+     * Parse and validate a refresh token
+     * 
+     * @param string $refreshToken The token to parse
+     * @throws ConstraintViolation If the token is an access token or invalid
+     * @return UnencryptedToken
+     */
     public function parserRefreshToken(string $refreshToken): UnencryptedToken

Also applies to: 76-77


Line range hint 1-150: Minor improvements for code quality

  1. Method names use "parser" instead of "parse" which is non-standard English:

    • parserRefreshTokenparseRefreshToken
    • parserAccessTokenparseAccessToken
  2. Consider adding a configuration type for better type safety:

    /**
     * @param array{
     *   alg: Signer,
     *   key: Key,
     *   ttl: int,
     *   refresh_ttl: int,
     *   blacklist: array{
     *     enable: bool,
     *     connection: string,
     *     ttl: int
     *   }
     * } $config
     */
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 11252c7 and b8edb45.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/Jwt/AbstractJwt.php (2 hunks)
  • src/Jwt/AccessTokenConstraint.php (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/Jwt/AbstractJwt.php (1)

34-34: Verify dependency injection and method usage

Please ensure:

  1. The dependency injection container is configured to provide AccessTokenConstraint
  2. All calls to the parser methods are updated if method names are changed
✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the DI configuration and method implementations.


Let me check one more thing to verify the DI configuration for the new dependencies.


Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:

The changes are properly implemented and safe

The verification shows:

  1. The AccessTokenConstraint is properly used in AbstractJwt along with its companion RefreshTokenConstraint
  2. The parser methods (parserAccessToken and parserRefreshToken) are correctly implemented and their usage in AbstractTokenMiddleware remains compatible
  3. The constraints are properly defined in their own files (src/Jwt/AccessTokenConstraint.php and src/Jwt/RefreshTokenConstraint.php)
  4. The framework appears to use autowiring for DI, which means explicit configuration isn't required for these constraint classes
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for parser method usage
echo "Searching for parser method usage..."
rg -l "parserRefreshToken|parserAccessToken"

# Search for DI configuration
echo "Searching for DI configuration..."
fd -e php -e xml -e yaml config

Length of output: 497


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check DI configuration in JwtAuth module
echo "Checking JwtAuth ConfigProvider..."
cat src/JwtAuth/ConfigProvider.php

# Check the actual implementation of parser methods
echo -e "\nChecking AbstractJwt implementation..."
cat src/Jwt/AbstractJwt.php

# Check interface definition
echo -e "\nChecking JwtInterface..."
cat src/Jwt/JwtInterface.php

# Check middleware usage
echo -e "\nChecking AbstractTokenMiddleware..."
cat src/JwtAuth/Middleware/AbstractTokenMiddleware.php

Length of output: 9304


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for dependency injection configuration in other potential locations
echo "Searching for dependency configuration..."
rg -l "AccessTokenConstraint|RefreshTokenConstraint" --type php

# Check if there's a services.php or dependencies.php
fd -e php | grep -i "service\|dependenc"

Length of output: 444

@zds-s zds-s merged commit e426e1f into mineadmin:3.0 Dec 4, 2024
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request size:M This PR changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants