-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update kubespray image to 2.18.1 #8644
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: floryut The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
ccc7d85
to
07738e2
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/cc @oomichi
cpus: 2 | ||
memory: 1024 | ||
groups: | ||
- kube_control_plane |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is the reason why here moves centos7 molecule test due to unstable test?
It is fine to drop the molecule test for me, just confirming.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hmm, most pull requests are facing the same issue.
It is fine to drop the test at this time.
If necessary, we just need to revert the test later.
/lgtm
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry didn't see it before, yes my idea was to remove it so test are passing and see later on if we need to add it back 😊
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
What this PR does / why we need it:
Update image to use new 2.18.x tag
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
None
Special notes for your reviewer:
None
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: