Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is new tooling required to support the standard platform TFMs with classic PCL? #15634

Closed
tillig opened this issue Nov 5, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@tillig
Copy link
Contributor

tillig commented Nov 5, 2015

I have a NuGet package targeting dotnet5.2 that I've built and I'm trying to test that in conjunction with a standard VS 2015 Portable Class Library targeting Profile111.

<TargetFrameworkProfile>Profile111</TargetFrameworkProfile>
<TargetFrameworkVersion>v4.5</TargetFrameworkVersion>

Per the new documentation, I gather this should work.

However, in trying it, I see the following error:

Could not install package 'Autofac 4.0.0-rc1-1'. You are trying to install this package into a project that targets '.NETPortable,Version=v4.5,Profile=Profile111', but the package does not contain any assembly references or content files that are compatible with that framework. For more information, contact the package author.

Am I wrong? Is there a step I'm missing? Or is there an upcoming NuGet update that will make this possible?

@davidfowl
Copy link
Member

@tillig Updated to doc pointing to the issue which has the remaining work. Mapping portable is one of those things.

@davidfowl
Copy link
Member

Closing this as it isn't actionable right now. With the RC2 release, netstandard should work across the board

@msftgits msftgits transferred this issue from dotnet/corefx Jan 31, 2020
@msftgits msftgits added this to the 1.0.0-rc2 milestone Jan 31, 2020
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 4, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants