Update to ASP.NET Core shared framework 2.1.0-preview1-28031

[natemcmaster]

In 2.1.0, ASP.NET Core is replacing the runtime package store with a shared framework, similar to Microsoft.NETCore.App. This PR updates packages and installers to pull the sharedfx instead of the runtime store.

In this PR:

• updates to 2.1.0-preview1-28031
• Unifies aspnetcore packages and installer downloads to one version variable
• Unifies to one aspnetcore myget feed

Not in this PR:

• orchestrated build support
• because the "trampoline" from the 2.0 runtime store to 2.1 shared framework is not yet implemented in corehost, I'll send a second PR soon to include the 2.0 runtime store alongside the 2.1 aspnetcore shared fx. Our goal is to have the host updated so this can be removed before rtm.

[natemcmaster]

Test failures:

---

• Windows_NT_ES x64 Debug Build
• Windows_NT x86 Debug Build
• Ubuntu16.04 x64 Debug Build
• CentOS7.1 x64 Debug Build

test\dotnet-new.Tests\TemplateRestoresAndBuildsWithoutWarningsC#_angular\temp\temp.csproj(35,5): error : Node.js is required to build and run this project. To continue, please install Node.js from https://nodejs.org/, and then restart your command prompt or IDE.

How do I update these builds to install NodeJS?

---

• Alpine3.6 x64 Debug Build

@JunTaoLuo any idea what we need to do to support Alpine Linux? I don't know if our native dependencies (libuv/sqlite) support musl-based Linux distros.

---

• RHEL6 x64 Debug Build

@JunTaoLuo does our portable linux-x64 build support these OSes?

[natemcmaster]

@livarcocc why is RHEL6 is building with UsePortableLinuxSharedFramework == false? I can fix this leg of the build by special casing `rhel.6-x64' to download the "portable linux" build of aspnetcore

[johnbeisner]

@janvorli
Can you answer Nate's question above please.

[johnbeisner]

@natemcmaster
"download the "portable linux" build of aspnetcore" - we were already doing just that.
From: https://devdiv.visualstudio.com/DevDiv/Default/_build/index?buildId=1272380&_a=summary
Downloading 'https://dotnetcli.azureedge.net/dotnet/Runtime/2.1.0-preview1-26105-02/dotnet-runtime-2.1.0-preview1-26105-02-linux-x64.tar.gz' to '/opt/code/bin/2/linux-x64/intermediate/coreSetupDownload/2.1.0-preview1-26105-02/combinedSharedHostAndFrameworkArchive.tar.gz'

[natemcmaster]

@johnbeisner Ah. I think I'm using the wrong variable. I have CoreSetupRid, not SharedFrameworkRid.....will update

[natemcmaster]

@johnbeisner I'm still getting SharedFrameworkRid == rhel.6-x64. don't know if that's by design or not, so I'm going to just manually update my conditions to map rhel.6-x64 to portable linux installers for aspnet

[natemcmaster]

I've updated the tests to skip NodeJS, and fixed the issues in building for RHEL 6 and Alpine.

[livarcocc]

@natemcmaster Ubuntu failure seems legit:

21:03:05 �[39;49m�[31m
21:03:05        "/opt/code/build.proj" (default target) (1) ->
21:03:05        (BuildSdkDeb target) -> 
21:03:05          /opt/code/build/package/Installer.DEB.proj(28,7): error MSB3073: The command "sudo dpkg -i /opt/code/bin/2/linux-x64/packages/aspnetcore-runtime-2.1.0-preview1-28006-ubuntu.14.04-x64.deb" exited with code 1. [/opt/code/build.proj]

[natemcmaster]

@livarcocc I just pushed an update to use aspnet 2.1.0-preview1-28031 which includes our aspnet's debian agnostic installers.

[natemcmaster]

@livarcocc prior to pushing the 28031 update to the PR, the build log failure was this:

21:03:02          Preparing to unpack .../aspnetcore-runtime-2.1.0-preview1-28006-ubuntu.14.04-x64.deb ...
21:03:02          Unpacking aspnetcore-runtime-2.1.0-preview1-28006 (2.1.0-preview1-28006-1) ...
21:03:05          dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of aspnetcore-runtime-2.1.0-preview1-28006:
21:03:05           aspnetcore-runtime-2.1.0-preview1-28006 depends on aspnetcore-store-2.0.3; however:
21:03:05            Package aspnetcore-store-2.0.3 is not installed.
21:03:05           aspnetcore-runtime-2.1.0-preview1-28006 depends on dotnet-runtime-2.1.0-preview1-26102-01; however:
21:03:05            Package dotnet-runtime-2.1.0-preview1-26102-01 is not installed.
21:03:05          
21:03:05          dpkg: error processing package aspnetcore-runtime-2.1.0-preview1-28006 (--install):
21:03:05           dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
21:03:05          Errors were encountered while processing:
21:03:05           aspnetcore-runtime-2.1.0-preview1-28006
21:03:05 

Do we need to have the transitive closure of debian packages available in order to build with the aspnetcore debian packages? If so, this will cause a coherence issue since dotnet/CLI currently consumes core-setup deb installers directly, and aspnetcore's deb installers also reference core-setup, but is not guaranteed to be the same version

[johnbeisner]

@natemcmaster
Have you looked at the 'coherence' check? In file: 'RuntimeCoherence.targets' Target='EvaluateRuntimeCoherence'

In your evaluation does the coherence check still work correctly?

[natemcmaster]

Have you looked at the 'coherence' check? In file: 'RuntimeCoherence.targets' Target='EvaluateRuntimeCoherence'

Yes, I've looked at it. I believe it works...though I haven't verified this with an actual coherent version of aspnetcore yet.

[natemcmaster]

https://ci.dot.net/job/dotnet_cli/job/master/job/debug_windows_nt_es_x64_prtest/529/ appears to be hung. What's the right dotnet-bot incantation to restart a PR build for one leg?

[mmitche]

@dotnet-bot test Windows_NT_ES x64 Debug Build

[natemcmaster]

@livarcocc @johnbeisner CI checks are green now. Ok to merge?

[livarcocc]

Thanks for working through this @natemcmaster.

[janvorli]

@natemcmaster

why is RHEL6 is building with UsePortableLinuxSharedFramework == false

The RHEL 6 cannot use portable build of the runtime, since the versions of various shared libraries we depend on are too old to be usable with the portable build. That's why the RHEL 6 version of coreclr is non-portable.