This repository was archived by the owner on Dec 14, 2018. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
Fix bounds checking in PagedCharBuffer
and related code
#5354
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -265,6 +265,66 @@ public async Task FlushAsync_ReturnsPages() | |
Assert.Equal(3, pool.Returned.Count); | ||
} | ||
|
||
[Fact] | ||
public async Task FlushAsync_FlushesContent() | ||
{ | ||
// Arrange | ||
var pool = new TestArrayPool(); | ||
var inner = new StringWriter(); | ||
|
||
var writer = new PagedBufferedTextWriter(pool, inner); | ||
for (var i = 0; i < Content.Length; i++) | ||
{ | ||
writer.Write(Content[i]); | ||
} | ||
|
||
// Act | ||
await writer.FlushAsync(); | ||
|
||
// Assert | ||
Assert.Equal<char>(Content, inner.ToString().ToCharArray()); | ||
} | ||
|
||
[Fact] | ||
public async Task FlushAsync_WritesContentToInner() | ||
{ | ||
// Arrange | ||
var pool = new TestArrayPool(); | ||
var inner = new StringWriter(); | ||
|
||
var writer = new PagedBufferedTextWriter(pool, inner); | ||
for (var i = 0; i < Content.Length; i++) | ||
{ | ||
writer.Write(Content[i]); | ||
} | ||
|
||
// Act | ||
await writer.FlushAsync(); | ||
|
||
// Assert | ||
Assert.Equal<char>(Content, inner.ToString().ToCharArray()); | ||
} | ||
|
||
[Fact] | ||
public async Task FlushAsync_WritesContentToInner_WithLargeArrays() | ||
{ | ||
// Arrange | ||
var pool = new RentMoreArrayPool(); | ||
var inner = new StringWriter(); | ||
|
||
var writer = new PagedBufferedTextWriter(pool, inner); | ||
for (var i = 0; i < Content.Length; i++) | ||
{ | ||
writer.Write(Content[i]); | ||
} | ||
|
||
// Act | ||
await writer.FlushAsync(); | ||
|
||
// Assert | ||
Assert.Equal<char>(Content, inner.ToString().ToCharArray()); | ||
} | ||
|
||
private class TestArrayPool : ArrayPool<char> | ||
{ | ||
public IList<char[]> Returned { get; } = new List<char[]>(); | ||
|
@@ -279,5 +339,20 @@ public override void Return(char[] buffer, bool clearArray = false) | |
Returned.Add(buffer); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
private class RentMoreArrayPool : ArrayPool<char> | ||
{ | ||
public IList<char[]> Returned { get; } = new List<char[]>(); | ||
|
||
public override char[] Rent(int minimumLength) | ||
{ | ||
return new char[2 * minimumLength]; | ||
} | ||
|
||
public override void Return(char[] buffer, bool clearArray = false) | ||
{ | ||
Returned.Add(buffer); | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Could this just no-op? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Not using There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. 🙈 |
||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks identical to the previous test. What am I missing here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could add the new assertion to the previous test. But they're really looking for unrelated things in the same scenario. Could change the previous test's name and merge the two. LMK if you feel strongly...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's fine. I just wasn't sure if this was a copy-paste error