Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on May 28, 2024. It is now read-only.

run models with tmmn and tmmx #155

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 28, 2022
Merged

Conversation

galengorski
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR is in reference to #153 , running all four models with tmmx and tmmn. The PR updates the config files and the weights from the model runs

Copy link
Collaborator

@lekoenig lekoenig left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, @galengorski! I added just one (unrelated) question about the model config files. And I'm curious - can you tell if adding tmmn had any impact on the model performance?

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ exp_name: "1b_multitask_do_gpp"

site_set: "well_obs"
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not related to "tmmx" or "tmmn", but is there a reason we use "well_obs" for site_set here, but "med_obs" for the others?

@lekoenig
Copy link
Collaborator

And I'm curious - can you tell if adding tmmn had any impact on the model performance?

I now see that you've included a few plots in #152 😊

Copy link
Collaborator

@jsadler2 jsadler2 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@lekoenig lekoenig linked an issue Sep 8, 2022 that may be closed by this pull request
@lekoenig lekoenig merged commit 32a7ea4 into USGS-R:main Sep 28, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Rerun baseline LSTM with tmmn and tmmx
4 participants