Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Performance] Compatible with flashmask API rename upgrade #9019

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 30, 2024

Conversation

GuoxiaWang
Copy link
Contributor

PR types

Function optimization

PR changes

APIs

Description

compatible with flashmask API rename upgrade

Copy link

paddle-bot bot commented Aug 27, 2024

Thanks for your contribution!

Copy link
Collaborator

@wawltor wawltor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 27, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 54.12%. Comparing base (f6fc7ff) to head (4b5d739).
Report is 345 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
paddlenlp/transformers/llama/fusion_ops.py 0.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #9019      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    54.05%   54.12%   +0.06%     
===========================================
  Files          650      650              
  Lines       103884   103886       +2     
===========================================
+ Hits         56155    56227      +72     
+ Misses       47729    47659      -70     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ZHUI ZHUI changed the title compatible with flashmask API rename upgrade [Performance] Compatible with flashmask API rename upgrade Sep 13, 2024
@ZeyuChen ZeyuChen merged commit 1fc9429 into PaddlePaddle:develop Sep 30, 2024
9 of 12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants