Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat/build model graph #989

Draft
wants to merge 48 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

yashgoyal0110
Copy link
Contributor

fixes: #724

@yashgoyal0110 yashgoyal0110 requested a review from arkid15r as a code owner March 3, 2025 19:33
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 3, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced an automated process that generates and updates a visual diagram of the Django models.
    • Enhanced project documentation by adding a new "Django Models Graph" section that displays the generated visualization.
  • Chores

    • Refined configuration and dependency management to support the new model visualization process.

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a new GitHub Actions workflow to automate the generation of a Django models graph. It adds a section in the README with the generated graph image. Other changes include updates to configure Django settings via environment variables in manage.py, additional development dependencies in the project’s configuration, and modifications in settings files to update the secret key handling and include the django_extensions application.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/workflows/generate_erd.yml Added a new GitHub Actions workflow that automates the generation of a Django models graph. The workflow triggers on pushes to specific paths and via manual dispatch, and it includes steps for code checkout, Python and dependency setup, system package installation, environment file preparation, graph generation, and artifact upload.
README.md Appended a new "Django Models Graph" section that describes the auto-generated visualization and includes an image reference (backend/backend_models.png) of the Django models graph.
backend/manage.py Modified the configuration to use os.getenv() for setting DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE and DJANGO_CONFIGURATION with default values, allowing runtime overrides rather than hardcoding these values.
backend/pyproject.toml Introduced two new development dependencies: django-extensions (version ^3.2.3) and pydotplus (version ^2.0.2).
backend/settings/base.py Updated the SECRET_KEY declaration from values.SecretValue() to values.Value(), changing how the secret key is processed.
backend/settings/local.py Added django_extensions to the INSTALLED_APPS attribute in the Local class.
backend/settings/test.py Added django_extensions to the INSTALLED_APPS variable in the global scope.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cf16d6b and a69e7ce.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • backend/poetry.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • README.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
  • GitHub Check: CodeQL (python)
  • GitHub Check: CodeQL (javascript-typescript)
  • GitHub Check: Run backend tests
  • GitHub Check: Run frontend e2e tests
  • GitHub Check: Run frontend unit tests

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added docs Improvements or additions to documentation backend ci labels Mar 3, 2025
@yashgoyal0110 yashgoyal0110 marked this pull request as draft March 3, 2025 19:34
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 7

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
backend/pyproject.toml (1)

55-55: Fix whitespace issue

There's an extra blank line here that should be consistent with the rest of the file.

-

 [tool.poetry.group.test.dependencies]
backend/manage.py (1)

9-10: Improved configuration flexibility with environment variables

The change to use os.getenv() with default fallbacks enhances flexibility by allowing environment variables to override the default Django settings. This is a good practice that enables different configuration settings across environments without code changes.

To address the line length issue (105 > 99 characters), consider breaking down line 9:

-    os.environ.setdefault("DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE", os.getenv("DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE", "settings.test"))
+    os.environ.setdefault(
+        "DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE", 
+        os.getenv("DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE", "settings.test")
+    )
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)

9-9: Line too long (105 > 99)

(E501)

.github/workflows/generate_erd.yml (2)

74-82: Improve Git operations security and error handling

While the current implementation correctly uses GITHUB_TOKEN for authentication, there are a few improvements that can be made:

  1. Use the github.token context variable instead of retrieving from secrets
  2. Be more specific about which changes to commit
  3. Improve error handling
- env:
-   GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
  run: |
    git config --global user.name "github-actions[bot]"
    git config --global user.email "github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com"
-   git add backend/backend_models.png README.md
+   # Check if files were actually modified
+   if [[ -f backend/backend_models.png ]]; then
+     git add backend/backend_models.png
+     # Only add README.md if it was changed
+     git diff --quiet README.md || git add README.md
+   fi
    git commit -m "Update model diagram" || echo "No changes to commit"
-   git push https://x-access-token:${GITHUB_TOKEN}@github.com/${{ github.repository }}.git ${{ github.ref }} || echo "No changes to push"
+   git push https://x-access-token:${{ github.token }}@github.com/${{ github.repository }}.git ${{ github.ref }} || echo "No changes to push"

1-89: Consider implementing workflow concurrency controls

For workflows that modify and push to the repository, it's important to implement concurrency controls to prevent race conditions when multiple workflow runs try to push changes simultaneously.

Add a concurrency section at the top of the workflow:

name: Generate Models Graph

+concurrency:
+  group: ${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.ref }}
+  cancel-in-progress: true
+
on:
  push:
    paths:
      - "backend/apps/**/models/**"
      - "pyproject.toml"
      - "README.md"
  workflow_dispatch:
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

17-17: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


20-20: the runner of "actions/setup-python@v4" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[error] 33-33: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 65-65: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c55e7ee and df949e9.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • backend/backend_models.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • backend/poetry.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • .github/workflows/generate_erd.yml (1 hunks)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • backend/manage.py (1 hunks)
  • backend/pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
  • backend/settings/base.py (1 hunks)
  • backend/settings/local.py (1 hunks)
  • backend/settings/test.py (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • README.md
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
backend/settings/test.py

11-11: Single quotes found but double quotes preferred

Replace single quotes with double quotes

(Q000)


11-11: No newline at end of file

Add trailing newline

(W292)

backend/settings/local.py

19-19: Single quotes found but double quotes preferred

Replace single quotes with double quotes

(Q000)


20-20: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


20-20: No newline at end of file

Add trailing newline

(W292)

backend/manage.py

9-9: Line too long (105 > 99)

(E501)

🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/generate_erd.yml

17-17: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


20-20: the runner of "actions/setup-python@v4" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/generate_erd.yml

[error] 33-33: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 65-65: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

🔇 Additional comments (5)
backend/pyproject.toml (1)

49-50: LGTM! Adding required dependencies for ERD generation

The addition of django-extensions and pydotplus as development dependencies is appropriate for generating the Django models graph as mentioned in the PR objectives.

.github/workflows/generate_erd.yml (4)

3-10: Appropriate workflow trigger configuration

The workflow triggers are well-defined, specifically targeting model changes and relevant configuration files. The manual trigger option via workflow_dispatch is also a good addition for on-demand generation.


85-88: Use the latest upload-artifact version

You're already using v4 of the upload-artifact action, which is good. This step is correctly implemented.


20-22:

❓ Verification inconclusive

Update GitHub Actions version and consider Python version

The actions/setup-python action is using an outdated version. Also, Python 3.13 is very new and might not be stable for production use.

-        uses: actions/setup-python@v4
+        uses: actions/setup-python@v5

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for the latest version of actions/setup-python
curl -s https://api.github.com/repos/actions/setup-python/releases/latest | grep '"tag_name":' | sed -E 's/.*"([^"]+)".*/\1/'

Length of output: 134


Action Required: Update Action Version and Confirm Python Stability

The latest release of actions/setup-python is v5.4.0, so please update the action reference as follows:

  • File: .github/workflows/generate_erd.yml (lines 20-22)
  • Change Diff:
    -        uses: actions/setup-python@v4
    +        uses: actions/setup-python@v5

Additionally, since Python 3.13 is very new, please evaluate its stability for production environments and consider downgrading to a more established release if needed.

🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

20-20: the runner of "actions/setup-python@v4" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


17-17:

✅ Verification successful

Update GitHub Actions version

The version of actions/checkout is outdated. GitHub Actions runners have been updated and may have compatibility issues with older versions.

-        uses: actions/checkout@v3
+        uses: actions/checkout@v4

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for the latest version of actions/checkout
curl -s https://api.github.com/repos/actions/checkout/releases/latest | grep '"tag_name":' | sed -E 's/.*"([^"]+)".*/\1/'

Length of output: 130


Update GitHub Actions Checkout Version to v4

The workflow still uses actions/checkout@v3, but our verification shows the latest release is v4.2.2. To ensure compatibility with updated runners, please update the action. You can either pin to the specific version (e.g., v4.2.2) or use the major version alias (v4) to automatically receive minor updates. For clarity, here’s the suggested diff:

-        uses: actions/checkout@v3
+        uses: actions/[email protected]
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

17-17: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

Comment on lines 10 to 11

INSTALLED_APPS = + ('django_extensions',)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix syntax error and indentation in INSTALLED_APPS definition

There are two issues with the INSTALLED_APPS definition:

  1. The variable is defined outside the Test class, but it should be a class attribute
  2. There's a syntax error with the + operator that's missing a left operand
-
-INSTALLED_APPS = + ('django_extensions',)
+    INSTALLED_APPS = Base.INSTALLED_APPS + ('django_extensions',)

This correction properly extends the INSTALLED_APPS from the Base class and maintains the correct indentation as a class attribute.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
INSTALLED_APPS = + ('django_extensions',)
INSTALLED_APPS = Base.INSTALLED_APPS + ('django_extensions',)
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)

11-11: Single quotes found but double quotes preferred

Replace single quotes with double quotes

(Q000)


11-11: No newline at end of file

Add trailing newline

(W292)

Comment on lines 18 to 20

INSTALLED_APPS = + ('django_extensions',)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix syntax error in INSTALLED_APPS definition

The INSTALLED_APPS definition has a syntax error with the + operator missing a left operand. Also, it's preferred to use double quotes for string literals in this codebase.

-    INSTALLED_APPS = + ('django_extensions',)
+    INSTALLED_APPS = Base.INSTALLED_APPS + ("django_extensions",)

This correction properly extends the INSTALLED_APPS from the Base class and uses double quotes for consistency with the codebase style.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
INSTALLED_APPS = + ('django_extensions',)
INSTALLED_APPS = Base.INSTALLED_APPS + ("django_extensions",)
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)

19-19: Single quotes found but double quotes preferred

Replace single quotes with double quotes

(Q000)


20-20: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


20-20: No newline at end of file

Add trailing newline

(W292)

@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ class Base(Configuration):
DEFAULT_AUTO_FIELD = "django.db.models.BigAutoField"

# SECURITY WARNING: keep the secret key used in production secret!
SECRET_KEY = values.SecretValue()
SECRET_KEY = values.Value()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Revert SECRET_KEY to SecretValue for security reasons

Changing SECRET_KEY from values.SecretValue() to values.Value() reduces security by potentially exposing the secret key in debug outputs, logs, and error messages. SecretValue is specifically designed to handle sensitive information like secret keys.

-    SECRET_KEY = values.Value()
+    SECRET_KEY = values.SecretValue()

This maintains the appropriate security handling for this sensitive configuration value.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
SECRET_KEY = values.Value()
SECRET_KEY = values.SecretValue()

Comment on lines +68 to +72
cd backend
set -a
source .env.backend
set +a
poetry run python manage.py graph_models -a -g -o backend_models.png
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Update environment variable sourcing for clarity

Since we're consolidating to a single .env file in the previous recommendations, the environment variable sourcing needs to be updated.

- set -a
- source .env.backend
- set +a
+ # Load environment variables from consolidated .env file
+ set -a
+ source .env
+ set +a
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
cd backend
set -a
source .env.backend
set +a
poetry run python manage.py graph_models -a -g -o backend_models.png
cd backend
# Load environment variables from consolidated .env file
set -a
source .env
set +a
poetry run python manage.py graph_models -a -g -o backend_models.png

Comment on lines +34 to +49
- name: Create and Populate .env File
run: |
touch backend/.env # Ensure the file exists
echo "DJANGO_SENTRY_DSN=${{ secrets.DJANGO_SENTRY_DSN }}" >> backend/.env
echo "DJANGO_SECRET_KEY=${{ secrets.DJANGO_SECRET_KEY }}" >> backend/.env
echo "SECRET_KEY=${{ secrets.SECRET_KEY }}" >> backend/.env
echo "DJANGO_CONFIGURATION=Test" >> backend/.env
echo "GITHUB_TOKEN=${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}" >> backend/.env
echo "DJANGO_DB_PASSWORD=${{ secrets.DJANGO_DB_PASSWORD }}" >> backend/.env
echo "DJANGO_ALLOWED_HOSTS=*" >> backend/.env # Example of a non-secret variable

- name: Debug .env file
run: |
ls -la backend # Check if the .env file exists
cat backend/.env | grep -v DJANGO_DB_PASSWORD | grep -v DJANGO_SECRET_KEY

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Secure the environment variable handling

There are several concerns with the current environment variable handling:

  1. Debugging environment variables can potentially expose sensitive information
  2. The grep filter might not catch all sensitive data
  3. Multiple .env files are being created, which can lead to confusion

Remove the debug step completely and consolidate environment variable handling:

- - name: Create and Populate .env File
-   run: |
-     touch backend/.env  # Ensure the file exists
-     echo "DJANGO_SENTRY_DSN=${{ secrets.DJANGO_SENTRY_DSN }}" >> backend/.env
-     echo "DJANGO_SECRET_KEY=${{ secrets.DJANGO_SECRET_KEY }}" >> backend/.env
-     echo "SECRET_KEY=${{ secrets.SECRET_KEY }}" >> backend/.env
-     echo "DJANGO_CONFIGURATION=Test" >> backend/.env
-     echo "GITHUB_TOKEN=${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}" >> backend/.env
-     echo "DJANGO_DB_PASSWORD=${{ secrets.DJANGO_DB_PASSWORD }}" >> backend/.env
-     echo "DJANGO_ALLOWED_HOSTS=*" >> backend/.env  # Example of a non-secret variable

- - name: Debug .env file
-   run: |
-     ls -la backend  # Check if the .env file exists
-     cat backend/.env | grep -v DJANGO_DB_PASSWORD | grep -v DJANGO_SECRET_KEY
+ - name: Create environment configuration
+   run: |
+     # Create a single .env file for the workflow
+     touch backend/.env
+     echo "DJANGO_SENTRY_DSN=${{ secrets.DJANGO_SENTRY_DSN }}" >> backend/.env
+     echo "DJANGO_SECRET_KEY=${{ secrets.DJANGO_SECRET_KEY }}" >> backend/.env
+     echo "SECRET_KEY=${{ secrets.SECRET_KEY }}" >> backend/.env
+     echo "DJANGO_CONFIGURATION=Test" >> backend/.env
+     echo "DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE=settings.test" >> backend/.env
+     echo "GITHUB_TOKEN=${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}" >> backend/.env
+     echo "DJANGO_DB_PASSWORD=${{ secrets.DJANGO_DB_PASSWORD }}" >> backend/.env
+     echo "DJANGO_ALLOWED_HOSTS=*" >> backend/.env
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- name: Create and Populate .env File
run: |
touch backend/.env # Ensure the file exists
echo "DJANGO_SENTRY_DSN=${{ secrets.DJANGO_SENTRY_DSN }}" >> backend/.env
echo "DJANGO_SECRET_KEY=${{ secrets.DJANGO_SECRET_KEY }}" >> backend/.env
echo "SECRET_KEY=${{ secrets.SECRET_KEY }}" >> backend/.env
echo "DJANGO_CONFIGURATION=Test" >> backend/.env
echo "GITHUB_TOKEN=${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}" >> backend/.env
echo "DJANGO_DB_PASSWORD=${{ secrets.DJANGO_DB_PASSWORD }}" >> backend/.env
echo "DJANGO_ALLOWED_HOSTS=*" >> backend/.env # Example of a non-secret variable
- name: Debug .env file
run: |
ls -la backend # Check if the .env file exists
cat backend/.env | grep -v DJANGO_DB_PASSWORD | grep -v DJANGO_SECRET_KEY
- name: Create environment configuration
run: |
# Create a single .env file for the workflow
touch backend/.env
echo "DJANGO_SENTRY_DSN=${{ secrets.DJANGO_SENTRY_DSN }}" >> backend/.env
echo "DJANGO_SECRET_KEY=${{ secrets.DJANGO_SECRET_KEY }}" >> backend/.env
echo "SECRET_KEY=${{ secrets.SECRET_KEY }}" >> backend/.env
echo "DJANGO_CONFIGURATION=Test" >> backend/.env
echo "DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE=settings.test" >> backend/.env
echo "GITHUB_TOKEN=${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}" >> backend/.env
echo "DJANGO_DB_PASSWORD=${{ secrets.DJANGO_DB_PASSWORD }}" >> backend/.env
echo "DJANGO_ALLOWED_HOSTS=*" >> backend/.env

Comment on lines 60 to 65
run: |
cd backend
export $(grep -v '^#' .env.backend | xargs)
poetry install --no-interaction --no-root --with dev
poetry add pydotplus # Ensure pydotplus is installed

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Improve dependency management

Adding pydotplus directly in the workflow is not ideal. Dependencies should be managed in the project's configuration files.

- poetry add pydotplus  # Ensure pydotplus is installed
+ # pydotplus should be included in the project's pyproject.toml as a dev dependency

Also, there's trailing whitespace at line 65 that should be removed.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
run: |
cd backend
export $(grep -v '^#' .env.backend | xargs)
poetry install --no-interaction --no-root --with dev
poetry add pydotplus # Ensure pydotplus is installed
run: |
cd backend
export $(grep -v '^#' .env.backend | xargs)
poetry install --no-interaction --no-root --with dev
# pydotplus should be included in the project's pyproject.toml as a dev dependency
🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[error] 65-65: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

@yashgoyal0110 yashgoyal0110 force-pushed the feat/build-model-graph branch from eee001c to f15b224 Compare March 3, 2025 19:37
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/generate_erd.yml (3)

16-18: Review Checkout Action Version
The workflow uses actions/checkout@v3 here. Static analysis indicates that this version might be outdated. Please verify if a newer version (or any required configuration changes) is recommended by GitHub Actions and update accordingly.

🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

17-17: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


19-23: Review Setup-Python Action Version
The actions/setup-python@v4 action is configured for Python 3.13. Similar to the checkout action, please verify that version v4 is the most up-to-date and best suited for your environment. Updating this action (if necessary) can help avoid potential issues.

🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

20-20: the runner of "actions/setup-python@v4" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


34-43: Create and Populate .env File – Consolidation Consideration
The step creates a backend/.env file and populates it with several secret values. While this approach is functional, note that later in the workflow another environment file (.env.backend) is used. Consider consolidating your environment variable management into a single file to improve clarity and reduce potential confusion.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between df949e9 and 1398fa3.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • backend/poetry.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • .github/workflows/generate_erd.yml (1 hunks)
  • backend/manage.py (1 hunks)
  • backend/pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
  • backend/settings/local.py (1 hunks)
  • backend/settings/test.py (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
  • backend/settings/test.py
  • backend/settings/local.py
  • backend/manage.py
  • backend/pyproject.toml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/generate_erd.yml

17-17: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


20-20: the runner of "actions/setup-python@v4" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
  • GitHub Check: CodeQL (python)
  • GitHub Check: Run frontend unit tests
  • GitHub Check: Run frontend e2e tests
  • GitHub Check: CodeQL (javascript-typescript)
  • GitHub Check: Run backend tests
🔇 Additional comments (6)
.github/workflows/generate_erd.yml (6)

45-49: Remove Debug Step for Environment Variables
The “Debug .env file” step prints out the contents of the .env file (even with some filtering). This could inadvertently expose sensitive information. As noted in previous reviews, it is advisable to remove or secure this debug step entirely.
[security]


50-58: Consolidate Secret Management
This step duplicates secret preparation by writing to .env.backend and mixing its usage with backend/.env. In light of earlier recommendations, consider removing this redundant step and consolidating all environment variables into a single file to prevent potential inconsistencies.


59-65: Manage Dependency Installation and Remove Trailing Whitespace
Within the “Install dependencies” step, the workflow changes to the backend directory, loads environment variables, installs dependencies via Poetry, and then runs poetry add pydotplus.

  • Dependency Management: Installing pydotplus dynamically here is not ideal. It should be managed in the project's configuration (e.g., included as a dev dependency in pyproject.toml).
  • Trailing Whitespace: Also, ensure that any trailing whitespace (noted at line 65) is removed to adhere to style guidelines.

66-73: Simplify Environment Variable Loading for Graph Generation
In this step, the workflow changes directory into backend and then executes environment variable loading from .env.backend before generating the models graph. Given that an environment file was already created earlier, this dual usage of different files may lead to confusion. Consider standardizing on a single environment file across all steps to simplify maintenance and reduce errors.


74-82: Commit and Push Changes – Good Practice Verification
The Git commit and push step is correctly configured to set up the Git user and push generated changes (like the updated models graph). Ensure that this step does not unintentionally commit any sensitive files and that it handles cases where there are no changes gracefully.


84-88: Artifact Upload Step is Correct
The final step uses actions/upload-artifact@v4 to upload the generated models graph. This implementation appears correct and follows best practices for artifact handling.

Comment on lines +36 to +43
touch backend/.env # Ensure the file exists
echo "DJANGO_SENTRY_DSN=${{ secrets.DJANGO_SENTRY_DSN }}" >> backend/.env
echo "DJANGO_SECRET_KEY=${{ secrets.DJANGO_SECRET_KEY }}" >> backend/.env
echo "SECRET_KEY=${{ secrets.SECRET_KEY }}" >> backend/.env
echo "DJANGO_CONFIGURATION=Test" >> backend/.env
echo "GITHUB_TOKEN=${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}" >> backend/.env
echo "DJANGO_DB_PASSWORD=${{ secrets.DJANGO_DB_PASSWORD }}" >> backend/.env
echo "DJANGO_ALLOWED_HOSTS=*" >> backend/.env # Example of a non-secret variable
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This doesn't look right. You shouldn't need the real secrets for building a model relations graph.

set +a
poetry run python manage.py graph_models -a -g -o backend_models.png

- name: Commit and push changes
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this should be a part of our future docs building workflow and there will be no need in this PR creation extra logic.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
.github/workflows/generate_erd.yml (4)

16-18: Update GitHub Actions Checkout Version
The workflow uses actions/checkout@v3, but static analysis recommends updating to a newer version if available for enhanced performance and security. Please verify if a more current version (e.g., v4 if available) should be used.

🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

17-17: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


19-23: Validate the Python Setup Action Version
The action actions/setup-python@v4 is being used. Double-check that this version meets your requirements and consider updating if a later version is recommended by best practices.

🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

20-20: the runner of "actions/setup-python@v4" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


24-28: Optional: Pin Poetry Version for Consistency
Installing Poetry without specifying a version can lead to unexpected updates. It’s a good practice to pin a specific version in your installation command or via your dependency management configuration.


59-65: Refactor Dependency Installation for Consistency
Using poetry add pydotplus directly in the workflow is less ideal than having it declared as a development dependency (e.g., in your pyproject.toml). Additionally, note that trailing whitespace is detected at line 65.

-          poetry add pydotplus  # Ensure pydotplus is installed
+          # pydotplus should be included in pyproject.toml as a dev dependency

To remove trailing whitespace, simply ensure no extra spaces exist at the end of line 65.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between be78e4a and cf16d6b.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • backend/poetry.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/generate_erd.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/generate_erd.yml

17-17: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


20-20: the runner of "actions/setup-python@v4" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
  • GitHub Check: Run frontend unit tests
  • GitHub Check: CodeQL (python)
  • GitHub Check: Run frontend e2e tests
  • GitHub Check: CodeQL (javascript-typescript)
  • GitHub Check: Run backend tests
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/generate_erd.yml (2)

29-33: System Dependencies Installation Looks Good
The step correctly updates the package list and installs Graphviz, which is required for generating the models graph.


74-79: Artifact Upload Step is Implemented Correctly
The final step uploads the generated models graph artifact as expected.

Comment on lines +34 to +43
- name: Create and Populate .env File
run: |
touch backend/.env # Ensure the file exists
echo "DJANGO_SENTRY_DSN=${{ secrets.DJANGO_SENTRY_DSN }}" >> backend/.env
echo "DJANGO_SECRET_KEY=${{ secrets.DJANGO_SECRET_KEY }}" >> backend/.env
echo "SECRET_KEY=${{ secrets.SECRET_KEY }}" >> backend/.env
echo "DJANGO_CONFIGURATION=Test" >> backend/.env
echo "GITHUB_TOKEN=${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}" >> backend/.env
echo "DJANGO_DB_PASSWORD=${{ secrets.DJANGO_DB_PASSWORD }}" >> backend/.env
echo "DJANGO_ALLOWED_HOSTS=*" >> backend/.env # Example of a non-secret variable
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consolidate Environment Variable Configuration
Two different environment files are being created in subsequent steps. Consolidating all environment variables into a single file (for example, using only backend/.env) would improve clarity and reduce risks of misconfiguration or accidental exposure.

Comment on lines +45 to +49
- name: Debug .env file
run: |
ls -la backend # Check if the .env file exists
cat backend/.env | grep -v DJANGO_DB_PASSWORD | grep -v DJANGO_SECRET_KEY

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Remove Debug Step to Protect Sensitive Information
The "Debug .env file" step displays the contents of the .env file (even with filters), which might still expose sensitive data such as SECRET_KEY and GITHUB_TOKEN. It is recommended to remove this step (or restrict its execution strictly to development) to prevent potential leakage.

Comment on lines +50 to +58
- name: Prepare secrets
run: |
echo "DJANGO_SENTRY_DSN=${{ secrets.DJANGO_SENTRY_DSN }}" >> .env.backend
echo "DJANGO_SECRET_KEY=${{ secrets.DJANGO_SECRET_KEY }}" >> backend/.env.backend
echo "DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE=settings.test" >> backend/.env.backend
echo "DJANGO_CONFIGURATION=Test"
echo "SECRET_KEY=${{ secrets.SECRET_KEY }}" >> backend/.env
echo "GITHUB_TOKEN=${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}" >> backend/.env.backend

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Remove Redundant “Prepare Secrets” Step
This step creates an additional .env.backend file while you already have a .env file populated earlier. Consolidating environment variable handling into a single file not only minimizes redundancy but also reduces the risk of configuration mismatches or leaks.

Comment on lines +66 to +73
- name: Generate Models Graph
run: |
cd backend
set -a
source .env.backend
set +a
poetry run python manage.py graph_models -a -g -o backend_models.png

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Use a Consolidated Environment File for Graph Generation
This step sources .env.backend whereas the earlier step creates and populates backend/.env for environment variables. Using multiple files can lead to configuration mismatches. Align these steps by using a single, consolidated environment file.

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Mar 9, 2025

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backend ci docs Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add backend models graph build job
2 participants