You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
However, when i tried to filter data before training, I use the exact the same ENV and sampling-params, the accuracy and format-accuracy is different from the first step of online-sampling.
Since the first step of online-sampling should be identical to offline-sampling, the format-accuracy should be similar. However, there exists a huge gap.
The sampling-params:
online-sampling while offline-sampling, the format-rewards is nearly 15%, while online-sampling is 57%.
When I remove </answer> from the stop-token, online-sampling of the first step is similar to offline-sampling.
It's so odd.
Before submitting a new issue...
Make sure you already searched for relevant issues, and asked the chatbot living at the bottom right corner of the documentation page, which can answer lots of frequently asked questions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Your current environment
🐛 Describe the bug
I tried to run ppo/reinforce++ using openrlhf.
The dataset and reward-func is same to https://github.com/Open-Reasoner-Zero/Open-Reasoner-Zero/
However, when i tried to filter data before training, I use the exact the same ENV and sampling-params, the accuracy and format-accuracy is different from the first step of online-sampling.
Since the first step of online-sampling should be identical to offline-sampling, the format-accuracy should be similar. However, there exists a huge gap.
The sampling-params:
online-sampling while offline-sampling, the format-rewards is nearly 15%, while online-sampling is 57%.
Before submitting a new issue...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: