Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Standardise convention around references to "QC check"/"QC test" etc. #81

Open
intarga opened this issue Oct 2, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
Labels
tech debt internal/maintainability improvements

Comments

@intarga
Copy link
Member

intarga commented Oct 2, 2024

QC checks are sometimes referred to as checks, sometimes as tests, sometimes with the "QC" prefix, sometimes not. We should really come up with a convention and stick to it.

I favour going for "checks", because "tests" leads to a lot of confusion with unit/integration tests, and the "QC" prefix was introduced to mitigate this confusion, so is superfluous if we stop using "tests"

@intarga intarga added the tech debt internal/maintainability improvements label Oct 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
tech debt internal/maintainability improvements
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant