You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the bug
The feature extraction analyzer is supposed to be able to allow the creation of views/saved searches. However, this feature is bugged and will result in an error message when attempted to be executed.
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Upload a Timeline that contains email addresses that would be extracted by the email_address regex definition.
Run the Feature Extractions analyzer on this Timeline
See the error messages in the analyzer results.
Solution
The creation of aggregations with the feature extractions is not yet supported anyway. But it is linked to the creation of a saved search/view at the moment in this code. A similar result can already be archived using the tags option. In combination with the new UI this results in a very similar result (one easy way to see what was found by the extraction).
Therefore I propose to remove the create_view and aggregate options from the feature extraction for now.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Describe the bug
The feature extraction analyzer is supposed to be able to allow the creation of views/saved searches. However, this feature is bugged and will result in an error message when attempted to be executed.
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Solution
The creation of aggregations with the feature extractions is not yet supported anyway. But it is linked to the creation of a saved search/view at the moment in this code. A similar result can already be archived using the
tags
option. In combination with the new UI this results in a very similar result (one easy way to see what was found by the extraction).Therefore I propose to remove the
create_view
andaggregate
options from the feature extraction for now.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: