Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Schema Inaccuracy] Response for "/repos/{owner}/{repo}/replicas/caches" has incompatible example #4590

Open
rahulsom opened this issue Mar 6, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@rahulsom
Copy link

rahulsom commented Mar 6, 2025

Schema Inaccuracy

This is the json ref:

#/paths/~1repos~1{owner}~1{repo}~1replicas~1caches/get/responses/200/content/application~1json/examples/default/value

The field spec is

                      "git": {
                        "type": "object",
                        "properties": {
                          "sync_status": {
                            "type": "string",
                            "enum": [
                              "offline",
                              "inactive",
                              "in_sync",
                              "not_in_sync"
                            ]
                          },
                          "last_sync": {
                            "type": "string",
                            "format": "date-time"
                          }
                        },
                        "required": [
                          "sync_status",
                          "last_sync"
                        ]
                      }

The example is

                        "git": [
                          {
                            "sync_status": "in_sync"
                          },
                          {
                            "last_sync": "2022-01-10T19:33:52Z"
                          }
                        ]

I looked at GHES-3.12, GHES-3.13, GHES-3.14, GHES-3.15.

Expected

The example should have an object or the type spec should have a list.

Reproduction Steps

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant