feat: improve manual range picking and fix simulation of diagonal peaks in COSY prediction

[jobo322]

• fix the simulation of the peaks in the diagonal in COSY predicted spectra.
• improve auto-processing 2D raw data, apodization
• improve/fix the multiplicity determination by multiplet-analysis in manual range picking:
• • by phase the selected range data before analyze the multiplet
• • reduce criteria value for the selection of J coupling

[jobo322]

@lpatiny should we allow the prediction of COSY with cross-peaks with a path length of 4 bonds as max value?

[cloudflare-workers-and-pages]

Deploying nmrium with    Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit:	3739ff8
Status:	✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL:	https://2b2db811.nmrium.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL:	https://3307-manual-range-picking-re.nmrium.pages.dev

View logs

[lpatiny]

@lpatiny should we allow the prediction of COSY with cross-peaks with a path length of 4 bonds as max value?

No we should not. But we have the couplings coming back from the prediction so we should check from the result if there are some couplings or not. I would put a threshold of 1.5Hz in order to display the cosy coupling or not.

So we should not simply use 2J or 3J anymore but use the result from the prediction.

[lpatiny]

The COSY prediction seems indeed much more accurate.

It can be tested from:
https://3307-manual-range-picking-re.nmrium.pages.dev/#/SamplesDashboard/8kbdgnwtkbi/Prediction

We now have:

And before it was wrongly:

[lpatiny]

@jobo322 Is this PR related to issues ?

For COSY I agree it works correctly now.
I forgot about improve manual range picking and how to test it.