impl From<DynConnector> for aws_smithy_client::http_connector::HttpConnector

[joshtriplett]

Describe the bug

Currently, converting from a DynConnector to an aws_smithy_client::http_connector::HttpConnector requires aws_smithy_client::http_connector::HttpConnector::Prebuilt(Some(dyn_connector)). Please consider providing a From impl that makes this just dyn_connector.into().

Expected Behavior

dyn_connector.into()

Current Behavior

aws_smithy_client::http_connector::HttpConnector::Prebuilt(Some(dyn_connector))

Reproduction Steps

See description above.

Possible Solution

No response

Additional Information/Context

No response

Version

├── aws-config v0.15.0
│   ├── aws-http v0.15.0
│   │   ├── aws-smithy-http v0.45.0
│   │   │   ├── aws-smithy-eventstream v0.45.0
│   │   │   │   ├── aws-smithy-types v0.45.0
│   │   │   ├── aws-smithy-types v0.45.0 (*)
│   │   ├── aws-smithy-types v0.45.0 (*)
│   │   ├── aws-types v0.15.0
│   │   │   ├── aws-smithy-async v0.45.0
│   │   │   ├── aws-smithy-client v0.45.0
│   │   │   │   ├── aws-smithy-async v0.45.0 (*)
│   │   │   │   ├── aws-smithy-http v0.45.0 (*)
│   │   │   │   ├── aws-smithy-http-tower v0.45.0
│   │   │   │   │   ├── aws-smithy-http v0.45.0 (*)
│   │   │   │   ├── aws-smithy-types v0.45.0 (*)
│   │   │   ├── aws-smithy-http v0.45.0 (*)
│   │   │   ├── aws-smithy-types v0.45.0 (*)
│   ├── aws-sdk-sso v0.15.0
│   │   ├── aws-endpoint v0.15.0
│   │   │   ├── aws-smithy-http v0.45.0 (*)
│   │   │   ├── aws-types v0.15.0 (*)
│   │   ├── aws-http v0.15.0 (*)
│   │   ├── aws-sig-auth v0.15.0
│   │   │   ├── aws-sigv4 v0.15.0
│   │   │   │   ├── aws-smithy-eventstream v0.45.0 (*)
│   │   │   │   ├── aws-smithy-http v0.45.0 (*)
│   │   │   ├── aws-smithy-eventstream v0.45.0 (*)
│   │   │   ├── aws-smithy-http v0.45.0 (*)
│   │   │   ├── aws-types v0.15.0 (*)
│   │   ├── aws-smithy-async v0.45.0 (*)
│   │   ├── aws-smithy-client v0.45.0 (*)
│   │   ├── aws-smithy-http v0.45.0 (*)
│   │   ├── aws-smithy-http-tower v0.45.0 (*)
│   │   ├── aws-smithy-json v0.45.0
│   │   │   └── aws-smithy-types v0.45.0 (*)
│   │   ├── aws-smithy-types v0.45.0 (*)
│   │   ├── aws-types v0.15.0 (*)
│   ├── aws-sdk-sts v0.15.0
│   │   ├── aws-endpoint v0.15.0 (*)
│   │   ├── aws-http v0.15.0 (*)
│   │   ├── aws-sig-auth v0.15.0 (*)
│   │   ├── aws-smithy-async v0.45.0 (*)
│   │   ├── aws-smithy-client v0.45.0 (*)
│   │   ├── aws-smithy-http v0.45.0 (*)
│   │   ├── aws-smithy-http-tower v0.45.0 (*)
│   │   ├── aws-smithy-query v0.45.0
│   │   │   ├── aws-smithy-types v0.45.0 (*)
│   │   ├── aws-smithy-types v0.45.0 (*)
│   │   ├── aws-smithy-xml v0.45.0
│   │   ├── aws-types v0.15.0 (*)
│   ├── aws-smithy-async v0.45.0 (*)
│   ├── aws-smithy-client v0.45.0 (*)
│   ├── aws-smithy-http v0.45.0 (*)
│   ├── aws-smithy-http-tower v0.45.0 (*)
│   ├── aws-smithy-json v0.45.0 (*)
│   ├── aws-smithy-types v0.45.0 (*)
│   ├── aws-types v0.15.0 (*)
├── aws-sdk-ec2 v0.15.0
│   ├── aws-endpoint v0.15.0 (*)
│   ├── aws-http v0.15.0 (*)
│   ├── aws-sig-auth v0.15.0 (*)
│   ├── aws-smithy-async v0.45.0 (*)
│   ├── aws-smithy-client v0.45.0 (*)
│   ├── aws-smithy-http v0.45.0 (*)
│   ├── aws-smithy-http-tower v0.45.0 (*)
│   ├── aws-smithy-query v0.45.0 (*)
│   ├── aws-smithy-types v0.45.0 (*)
│   ├── aws-smithy-xml v0.45.0 (*)
│   ├── aws-types v0.15.0 (*)
├── aws-sdk-s3 v0.15.0
│   ├── aws-endpoint v0.15.0 (*)
│   ├── aws-http v0.15.0 (*)
│   ├── aws-sig-auth v0.15.0 (*)
│   ├── aws-sigv4 v0.15.0 (*)
│   ├── aws-smithy-async v0.45.0 (*)
│   ├── aws-smithy-client v0.45.0 (*)
│   ├── aws-smithy-eventstream v0.45.0 (*)
│   ├── aws-smithy-http v0.45.0 (*)
│   ├── aws-smithy-http-tower v0.45.0 (*)
│   ├── aws-smithy-types v0.45.0 (*)
│   ├── aws-smithy-xml v0.45.0 (*)
│   ├── aws-types v0.15.0 (*)
├── aws-sdk-sts v0.15.0 (*)
├── aws-smithy-client v0.45.0 (*)

Environment details (OS name and version, etc.)

Debian, latest sid

Logs

No response

[Velfi]

Sounds reasonable, I'll submit a PR and see what the rest of the team thinks.

[jdisanti]

This was added in smithy-lang/smithy-rs#1549 and should go out with the next SDK release.

[jdisanti]

This went out in the July 21st SDK release.

[github-actions]

⚠️COMMENT VISIBILITY WARNING⚠️

Comments on closed issues are hard for our team to see.
If you need more assistance, please either tag a team member or open a new issue that references this one.
If you wish to keep having a conversation with other community members under this issue feel free to do so.