You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Dec 14, 2018. It is now read-only.
This was based off a conversation with @loudej when we were discussing MvcRazorHost. The idea is RazorViewEngine is the default implementation we configure, but shouldn't be tied to MvcOptions. Instead it would be a separate top level options type that can be configured independently.
@pranavkm@loudej can someone explain why we want it this way? Putting things in MVC options makes it easier to find them, and since the view engine is tightly coupled to MVC, it's not really clear to me why the separation.
is it to make Web Pages feel disconnected from MVC when we implement it or is there another idea behind this?
This was based off a conversation with @loudej when we were discussing
MvcRazorHost
. The idea isRazorViewEngine
is the default implementation we configure, but shouldn't be tied toMvcOptions
. Instead it would be a separate top level options type that can be configured independently.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: